![]() The results of this study reveal a non-significant group difference between people with mild ID, moderate ID, and TD on the vividness of mental imagery and eidetic imagery. Measures for cognitive and adaptive functioning were administered to ascertain the ID level of participants. ![]() ![]() Their performance on the vividness scale was compared with typically developing individuals. There are many studies conducted on vividness in typically developing (TD) individuals, however, no attempt has been made either to assess the vividness of mental imagery in people with intellectual disability (ID) or compare it with that of typically developing (TD) adults.Ī vividness of imagery test (comprising a modified version of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire 2, (VVIQ-2 Marks, 1995), and two items of the Age Projection Test, (APT Ahsen, 1988) were administered to participants with mild, moderate, and severe ID. The vividness of mental imagery has been defined as the clarity, brightness, or intensity of an image as reported by the individual (Marks, 1973). Therapeutic Uses for Eidetic Image Psychology:īeyond developing his cornerstone tests, the Eidetic Parents Test and Age Projection Test, Dr.Mental imagery (MI) has been described as the “ability to simulate in the mind information that is not currently being perceived by the sense organs” (Moran, 2012, p. It offers potentials for healing and illumination of the mind at many levels as well, with applications to education, sociology, literature, and mythology. It is grounded in research and application of eidetic imagery in particular and imagery in general, with a wider view toward scientific study of the phenomena of consciousness both as visible and invisible, operational and nonoperational, vivid and unvivid, in the process discovering psychic order underneath the apparent chaos.Įidetic Image Psychology investigates both the structure and content of images, especially significant personal images, and the imagery analysis is then related to the subject’s development and future. On the other side, it is systematic, practical and targeted. It is deeply philosophical, dramatic, literary, spiritual and mythological. Its most widely known application is Eidetic Psychotherapy. Eidetic Image Psychology thus embodies what Ahsen calls a true Psychology of the Being and a Consciousness Psychology. The basis of healing and learning reside in these structures, interventions based on them and on the internal laws of imagery behavior. The method works totally through imagery blueprints and aims at demonstration of how different images affect the body, mind and emotions differently. In Eidetic Image Psychology, explorations of the psyche take place at molar levels, as in Freud and Jung. All images and thought processes, according to Ahsen, relate meaningfully to the eidetic, but each performs a separate and distinct function in the psyche. Ahsen refers to the ISM as the Triple Code Model of imagery, which is also an aspect of the operational definition of the structural eidetic. In an applied process sense, Ahsen’s Eidetic Image Psychology proposes that the image is central to psychological resolution, personal growth, new learning and enlightenment that in this form it is multisensory, multi-leveled, and experiential and that it appears in consciousness as a visual Image, a Somatic response and a Meaning (ISM) at one and the same time. It is a well-formulated set of principles and a comprehensive theory about the nature, structure and function of the image and the nature of consciousness based on his clinical and experimental work. Eidetic Image Psychology is a broad term which is used by Ahsen to centrally address important issues concerning the mental image.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |